These killings should be a national outrage. Congressional hearings should be conducted. Right now.
In fact, FBI Director James Comey is testifying as I write this…about email.
How I wish, instead, that he was testifying about why data regarding unjustifiable police killings doesn’t exist.
He delivered a speech about it last year at Georgetown University.
The first step to understanding what is really going on in our communities and in our country is to gather more and better data related to those we arrest, those we confront for breaking the law and jeopardizing public safety, and those who confront us. “Data” seems a dry and boring word but, without it, we cannot understand our world and make it better.
How can we address concerns about “use of force,” how can we address concerns about officer-involved shootings if we do not have a reliable grasp on the demographics and circumstances of those incidents? We simply must improve the way we collect and analyze data to see the true nature of what’s happening in all of our communities.
The FBI tracks and publishes the number of “justifiable homicides” reported by police departments. But, again, reporting by police departments is voluntary and not all departments participate. That means we cannot fully track the number of incidents in which force is used by police, or against police, including non-fatal encounters, which are not reported at all.
Without complete and accurate data, we are left with “ideological thunderbolts.” And that helps spark unrest and distrust and does not help us get better. Because we must get better, I intend for the FBI to be a leader in urging departments around this country to give us the facts we need for an informed discussion, the facts all of us need, to help us make sound policy and sound decisions with that information. –FBI Director James Comey
Why not ask Mr. Comey about this speech? Why not pledge to give him the tools he needs both to combat unjustifiable police killings, and influence behavior on the local and state level?
That’s just one of the many questions Members of Congress could be asking today–but aren’t.
Read or watch this important speech.
And remember that you can’t fix what you refuse to define or quantify.
America has a new Speaker of the House of Representatives: Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.
The 54th Speaker of the House–the first Speaker from the state of Wisconsin–succeeds former Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, who is also resigning his seat at the end of the year. Ryan was officially elected this morning by House members and sworn in by the dean of the House, Rep. John Conyers.
I could say a lot about the way business is conducted in the House of Representatives, and about how Members sometimes conduct themselves–and very little of it would be good.
Still, I am proud to see the peaceful transfer of power, whether it’s for a new President of the United States or Speaker of the House. Our country’s politics is so far from perfect, but this is a much preferred method of resolving our political differences than other methods to settle political disputes. And it is good to see the Members act like human beings instead of combatants. I saw more examples of unity and pageantry than displayed for the State of the Union address.
As you may know, March is Women’s History Month. Similar to Black History Month, I celebrate Women’s History Month by finding or re-discovering speeches delivered by women. Today, I kick off the month by highlighting a floor speech, Equal Rights for Women, made by Shirley Chisholm.
The fact is that a woman who aspires to be chairman of the board, or a Member of the House, does so for exactly the same reasons as any man. Basically, these are that she thinks she can do the job and she wants to try. Shirley Chisholm, “Equal Rights for Women.”